地址:廣州市天河區五山路371號中公教育大廈9樓
電話:020-35641330
地址:深圳市羅湖區深南東路5015號金豐城B座11樓(深圳書城旁大劇院F出口)
電話:0755-25838855
地址:佛山市禪城區祖廟路46號華輝大廈十八層
電話:0757-82030671
地址:潮州市楓春路454號美斯學谷7樓(華美整形隔壁)
電話:0751-8227500
地址:韶關市湞江區北江北路1號財富廣場26樓2612
電話:15389432552
地址:珠海市香洲區吉大景山路南航大廈404
電話:0756-3330812
地址:惠州市惠城區港惠新天地西區三座16樓整層(演達酒店入口)
電話:0752-5338621
地址:肇慶市端州區天寧北路75號廣發銀行大廈14樓
電話:0758-2312959
地址:東莞市東城區旗峰路國泰大廈909單位
電話:0769-22360660
發布日期:2019-12-22 14:06:04 來源:中國教育在線
廣東研招網小編給大家整理了“2020考研英語一試題原文完整版”相關內容,希望能幫助到各位考生。
Section I Use of English
Directions:
Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark [A], [B], [C], or [D] on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)
Even if families don’t sit down to eat together as frequently as before, millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nation’s great traditions: the Sunday roast. 1 a cold winter’s day, few culinary pleasures can 2 it. Yet as we report now. The food police are determined our health. That this 3 should be rendered yet another quality pleasure 4 to damage our health.
The Food Standards Authority (FSA) has 5 a public worming about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked 6 high temperatures. This means that people should 7 crisping their roast potatoes, reject thin—crust pizzas and only 8 toast their bread. But where is the evidence to support such alarmist advice? 9 studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice, there is no 10 evidence that it causes cancer in humans.
Scientists say the compound is 11 to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof 12 the precautionary principle it could be argued that it is 13 to follow the FSA advice. 14, it was rumoured that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a 15.
Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be 16 up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables, without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine. But would life be worth living? 17, the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods 18, but reduce their lifetime intake. However its 19 risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective. Constant health scares just 20 with one listening.
1. [A] In[B] Towards[C] On[D] Till
2. [A] match[B] express[C] satisfy[D] influence
3. [A] patience[B] enjoyment[C] surprise[D] concern
4 .[A] intensified[B] privileged[C] compelled[D] guaranteed
5. [A] issued[B] received[C] compelled[D] guaranteed
6. [A] under[B] at[C] for[D] by
7. [A] forget[B] regret[C] finish[D] avoid
8. [A] partially[B] regularly[C] easily[D] initially
9. [A] Unless[B] Since[C] If[D] While
10. [A] secondary[B] external[C] conclusive[D] negative
11. [A] insufficient[B] bound[C] likely[D] slow
12. [A] On the basis of[B] At the cost of[C] In addition to[D] In contrast to
13. [A] interesting[B] advisable[C] urgent[D] fortunate
14. [A] As usual[B] In particular[C] By definition[D] After all
15. [A] resemblance[B] combination[C] connection[D] pattern
16. [A] made[B] served[C] saved[D] used
17. [A] To be fair[B] For instance[C] To be brief[D] In general
18. [A] reluctantly[B] entirely[C] gradually[D] carefully
19. [A] promise[B] experience[C] campaign[D] competition
20. [A] follow up[B] pick up[C] open up[D] end up .
Section II Reading Comprehension
Part A Directions:
Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing [A], [B], [C], or [D]. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)
Text 1
A group of labour MPs, among them Yvette Cooper, are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK “town of culture” award. The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title, which was held by Hull in 2017 and has been awarded to Coventry for zoz1. Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull, where it brought in £220m of investment and an avalanche of arts, out not to be confined to cities. Britain’ town, it is true are not prevented from applying, but they generally lack the resources to put together a bit to beat their bigger competitions. A town of culture award could, it is argued, become an annual event, attracting funding and creating jobs.
Some might see the proposal as a boo by prize for the fact that Britain is no longer be able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture, a sough-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Liverpool in 2008. A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the
verge of disappearing into an endless fever of self-celebration in its desperation to reinvent itself for the post-Brexit world: after town of culture, who knows that will follow— village of culture? Suburb of culture? Hamlet of culture?
It is also wise lo recall that such titles are not a cure-all. A badly run “year of culture” washes in and out of a place like the tide, bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community. The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year. They transform the aspirations of the people who live there; they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light. It is hard to get right, and requires a remarkable degree of vision, as well as cooperation between city authorities, the private sector, community. groups and cultural organisations. But it can be done: Glasgow’s year as European capital of culture can certainly be seen as one of complex series of factors that have turned the city into the power of art, music and theatre that it remains today.
A “town of culture” could be not just about the arts but about honouring a town’s peculiarities
—helping sustain its high street, supporting local facilities and above all celebrating its people and turn it into action.
21. Cooper and her colleagues argue that a “town of culture” award could
[A] consolidate the town-city ties in Britain.
[B] promote cooperation among Britain’s towns.
[C] increase the economic strength of Britain’s towns.
[D] focus Britain’s limited resources on cultural events.
22. According to Paragraph 2, the proposal might be regarded by some as
[A] a sensible compromise.
[B] a self-deceiving attempt.
[C] an eye-catching bonus.
[D] an inaccessible target.
23. The author suggests that a title holder is successful only if it
[A] endeavours to maintain its image.
[B] meets the aspirations of its people.
[C] brings its local arts to prominence.
[D] commits to its long-term growth.
24. Glasgow is mentioned in Paragraph 3 to present
[A] a contrasting case. (B] a supporting example.
[C] a background story.
[D] a related topic.
25. What is the author’s attitude towards the proposal?
[A] Skeptical.
[B] Objective.
[C] Favourable.
[D] Critical.
免責聲明:本站所提供的內容均來源于網友提供或網絡搜集,由本站編輯整理,僅供個人研究、交流學習使用,不涉及商業盈利目的。如涉及版權問題,請聯系本站管理員予以更改或刪除。
上一篇: 2019年杭州師范大學碩士研究生招生考試自命題試卷
下一篇: 2020考研英語二試題原文完整版
課程系列 | 班次名稱 | 價格 | 免費試聽 |
考研政治網絡課堂 | 2022考研政治直播護航直通車 | ¥4800.00 | 免費試聽 |
2022考研政治全程進階班 |
¥980.00 | 免費試聽 | |
考研英語網絡課堂 | 2022考研英語一直播護航直通車(直播+1V20) | ¥4800.00 | 免費試聽 |
2022考研英語二直播護航直通車(直播+1V20) | ¥4800.00 | 免費試聽 | |
考研數學網絡課堂 | 2022考研數學直播護航直通車(直播+1V20) | ¥4800.00 | 免費試聽 |
2022考研數學全程進階班 | ¥980.00 | 免費試聽 | |
全程聯報課程 |
2022考研政治+英語(一)+數學聯報進階VIP班 |
¥2240.00 | 免費試聽 |
2022考研政治+英語(二)+數學聯報進階VIP班 |
¥2240.00 | 免費試聽 | |
2022考研政治+英語(一)聯報進階VIP班 |
¥1560.00 | 免費試聽 |
課程系列 | 班次名稱 | 價格 | 免費試聽 |
經濟學考研網絡課堂 |
2022考研經濟學(初級)全科進階VIP班 |
¥2940.00 | 免費試聽 |
2022考研經濟學(中級)全科進階VIP班 |
¥2940.00 | 免費試聽 | |
管理學考研網絡課堂 |
2022考研管理學全程進階班 |
¥1580.00 | 免費試聽 |
2022考研管理學全科進階VIP班 |
¥2940.00 | 免費試聽 | |
西醫考研網絡課堂 |
2022考研西醫綜合定向全科直通車 |
¥13800.00 | 免費試聽 |
教育學考研網絡課堂 |
2022考研教育學全程進階班 |
¥1980.00 | 免費試聽 |
心理學考研網絡課堂 |
2022考研心理學全程進階班 |
¥1980.00 | 免費試聽 |
中醫考研網絡課堂 |
2022考研中醫綜合全程進階班 |
¥1580.00 | 免費試聽 |
2022考研中醫綜合全科進階VIP班 |
¥2940.00 | 免費試聽 | |
計算機考研網絡課堂 |
2022考研計算機全科進階VIP班 |
¥2940.00 | 免費試聽 |